Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: FLASH: New Media OpEd pushes Flash- opinions? |
From: | Marco Alvarado |
Date: | Tue, 31 Aug 1999 05:33:50 +0100 |
You asked for some, now here they are.
> > If this isn't too off-topic, I'd love to hear what Flashers think (as an
> > admittedly biased source).
> >
> > What does Flash have that html doesn't (just list a few important things)?
Resizable Vector Graphics
Fluid interactivity and functionality
It Incorporates various senses (through visual and audio) in a seamless manner
The ability to create complex animations, interactions, and effects that
non-programmers can develop quicker and more effectively than some programmers
Bitterness from folks that fear change!
(just a few)
I'd like to see someone create a flash site in straight html using java or
whatever. Not much fun if you ask me, staring at lines of code.
>Flash is owned my macromedia who has shown repeatedly bad decision making.
>HTML is not owned. It is governed by standards organizations (developers and
>engineers not marketing pinheads).
Who doesn't make mistakes? The "philanthropist" overseeing html standards,
microsoft, apple (was almost bankrupt - hello top selling i-mac), ohh yeah
that's right Adobe doesn't make mistakes.
my 2 cents worth.
Take care flashers.
-marco
marcoaclemson [dot] edu
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com
Replies
Re: FLASH: New Media OpEd pushes Flash- , Robert Koberg
Replies
FLASH: New Media OpEd pushes Flash- opin, Chris Burke
Re: FLASH: New Media OpEd pushes Flash- , Robert Koberg
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]