Re: UKNM: Spidering frames

[jim smith]

At 7:01 pm +0100 on 28/4/99 you said:

>> Yes! And at the risk of repeating my point, there is no adequate solution

>> but to drop frames from any sections of a site you wish to be spidered.

>>

>> Anyone disagree?

>

>Aha, I caught myself agreeing with Ray earlier but can't pass up this

>opportunity to return to normality...

>

>Well, if you have a very, very cunning database driven site, you

>could proably build a spiderable version of it which didn't have

>frames, for arachnid consumption.

>

>The kind of interesting extra that clients always want when you

>mention it, but often won't want to pay for. Fun to do as an

>intellectual challenge ;-)


you can make a page from within a painset load the whole frameset with a

*really* trivial piece of javascript.


but you shouldn't, really, you shouldn't...


--//--------------------------------------------------------------------

jim smith -

jimflenser [dot] co [dot] uk

  -  http://www.flenser.co.uk  0961 319040

everything has been said, provided words do not change their meanings or

meanings their words                                         -- alpha 60 

********************

UKNM is sponsored by Excite UK, visit us at http://www.excite.co.uk.

Email Khalil Ibrahimi

khalilexcitecorp [dot] com (mailto:khalilexcitecorp [dot] com)

 to advertise on Excite.

********************

Change your UKNM subscription use http://www.chinwag.com/uknm.html