[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]

Subject: UKNM: Poor web site design
From: Ray Taylor
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 11:41:57 +0100

From: John Braithwaite <JohnBatGBGdirect [dot] com>
>Example of a poor site - www.waterstones.co.uk - how can a company that
>has re-designed a site three times in six months still get it so
>painfully wrong?? (Poor use of colours, frames and brains).

The question of good vs bad web site design comes up more often than
anything else on the list, but the thing that I find lacking in the
discussion is any question of objective criteria, methodology for assessing
web site effectiveness, or substantial research on the subject.

All we get is "I like this", "I don't like this", (obviously from people "in
the know" rather than potential customers).

Everyone has an opinion. Who's got the facts?

Ray Taylor

UKNM is sponsored by Excite UK, visit us at http://www.excite.co.uk.
Email Khalil Ibrahimi khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com (mailto:khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com) to advertise on Excite.
Change your UKNM subscription use http://www.chinwag.com/uknm.html

  Re: UKNM: Poor web site design, Jo Chipchase

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]