[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: UKNM: internet rights / wrongs -Reply
From: John Enser
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 16:00:57 GMT

>>> Richard Houston <Richard [dot] HoustonatUK [dot] Circle [dot] com> 23/March/2000
10:56am >>>
<snip>
>on a related subject .. as convergence "occurs", will there not be lots of
>punch-ups over the difference (or lack of) between internet and
>television broadcast rights?

Yes, undoubtedly, as there have been with all new media (Peggy Lee
won millions in damages when a court agreed that Disney had no rights
to put Lady and the Tramp onto video) - it is a transitory thing but until
it
is worked through, there are rich pickings ahead (mostly for the
lawyers)

>i wonder how these contracts are being worded.

Carefully. The best lawyers have seen this coming for several years. I
was first asked to advise on it in 1994

John


This firm is regulated by the Law Society in the conduct of investment
business. A list of partners is available for inspection at Olswang, 90
Long Acre, London, WC2E 9TT. This e-mail is intended only for the
above named addressee/s. This e-mail may be confidential or legally
privileged. If you have received this e-mail and you are not a named
addressee, please delete it from your system and contact the Olswang
IT department on +44 207 208 8888 (x8422).


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
post new media vacancies for free uknm-jobsatchinwag [dot] com
*******************
sponsor the uk-netmarketing list and website, contact
salesatchinwag [dot] com for more details.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]