[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: More webwashing
From: Rick Sareen
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 10:15:39 +0100

>Charlie Williams said:

It seems to have crossed the
>line that seperates info sites with an acceptable number of banners from
>banner sites with a bit of info at the bottom of each page.

How many are OK? Don't you only get one ad on the page?

Before the
>re-design it looked fairly okay, ie: nondescript as a text-based info site
>should be, plus a couple of easily-ignorable banners. Now it just looks
>shite.
>
>This is what happens when web designers assume users don't mind ads.

Not really sure why shite web design means the ads on the site should be
blamed.
anyway when I looked the ads were below the fold. So you won't be seeing
anything from Media21 there :-)

--
Rick Sareen
media21
40-42 Scrutton Street, London, EC2A 4QL
T: 0171 377 6122 M: 0958 584 181
rickatmedia21 [dot] co [dot] uk (mailto:rickatmedia21 [dot] co [dot] uk)

A member of CUT - Campaign for Unmetered Telecommunications
Please register your support for UNMETERED calls at
http://www.unmetered.org.uk
6 June 1999 - European Telecommunications Boycott

********************
UKNM is sponsored by Excite UK, visit us at http://www.excite.co.uk.
Email Khalil Ibrahimi khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com (mailto:khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com) to advertise on Excite.
********************
Change your UKNM subscription use http://www.chinwag.com/uknm.html



Replies
  Re: UKNM: More webwashing, Charlie.Williams

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]