[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: RE: DIXONS - FREE SHARE
From: Nigell Boulton
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:39:51 +0100

do you mean like WebMedia are strategic consultants.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Johnston <steveatimrg [dot] org>
To: uk-netmarketingatchinwag [dot] com <uk-netmarketingatchinwag [dot] com>
Date: 25 September 1998 10:34
Subject: Re: UKNM: RE: DIXONS - FREE SHARE


>On 24/09/98, at 17:01, Nigell Boulton wrote:
>
>>are you trying to get work from Dixons???
>
>Oh puleeease, you should have read my post all the way to the end where my
disclaimer sat. Anyway the IMRG is a membership organisation, we don't get
work 'from' anyone.
>
>Steve Johnston
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Steve Johnston <steveatimrg [dot] org>
>>To: uk-netmarketingatchinwag [dot] com <uk-netmarketingatchinwag [dot] com>
>>Date: 24 September 1998 16:54
>>Subject: UKNM: RE: DIXONS - FREE SHARE
>>
>>>Let's face it Dixons is on the whole a dreadful place to shop, and I
rarely
>>meet anybody who has a kind word to say about any of the Dixons Group
stores
>>(PCWorld, Currys, The Link & Dixons). But to the 'mass' market without
whom
>>our embryonic endeavours are futile in the long run, Dixons is their
gateway
>>(nay, portal) to the sexy and fast-growing world of high-powered consumer
>>electronics. As such, Dixons have a profound influence and a move like
this
>>should be embraced by the 'new media' industry as being of enormous
benefit.
>>Dixons windows are full of 'Free internet access' posters. This is good
>>news.
>>
>>>When you add to this the fact that somewhere within a terrifyingly
>>'traditional' retail business, in which executives will routinely sell
their
>>Grannies for half a percent, a huge leap of faith in the future has been
>>taken, and I would dearly love to see the internal justification for it.
>>When big legacy businesses such as the Dixons Group make investment
>>decisions the numbers are worked extremely hard, so what numbers are they
>>working on here in which John Clare (CEO) and Stanley Kalms (Chairman) are
>>confident of their exposure to risk and the likely return.
>>>
>>>The IMRG spends a good deal of time with big brand retailers, and frankly
>>it is depressing how limited the vision and understanding present is. So
to
>>see Dixons make a move like this is extremely good news. Retailers
typically

>>wait for their competition to move so that they have something to measure
>>their own position against. Dixons' move will be very good for retailer
>>attitudes towards the internet.
>>>
>>>Of course there are many holes to pick in the detail, and we all love
>>having someone to hate, but c'mon people, don't be so predictable.
>
>>>
>>>(Incidentally Dixons are not currently a member of the IMRG and the above
>>is not an attempt to impress them into becoming one. Frankly I would be
>>dumbstruck if anyone from the Dixons Group subscribed.)
>>>
>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Steve Johnston
>>>Director of Development
>>>IMRG (Interactive Media in Retail Group)
>>>
>>>http://www.imrg.org/
>>>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>5 Dryden Street, Covent Garden,
>>>London WC2E 9NW, UK
>>>
>>>Tel: +44 (0)7000 46 46 74
>>>Fax: +44 (0)7000 39 46 74
>>>Personal No: +44 (0)7050 6050 33
>>>E-mail: steveatimrg [dot] org
>>>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>The IMRG is the best source of commercial
>>>advantage for retail in the 4th channel
>>>
>
>Steve Johnston
>Director of Development
>IMRG (Interactive Media in Retail Group)
>
>http://www.imrg.org/
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>5 Dryden Street, Covent Garden,
>London WC2E 9NW, UK
>Tel: +44 (0)7000 46 46 74
>Fax: +44 (0)7000 39 46 74
>Personal No: +44 (0)7050 6050 33
>E-mail: steveatimrg [dot] org
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>The IMRG is the best source of commercial
>advantage for retail in the 4th channel
>



[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]