Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: FLASH: ZDNET's Comparison Flash v. LiveMotion |
From: | Gregg Caines |
Date: | Mon, 3 Apr 2000 18:35:50 +0100 |
The bitmap issue is only really touched on, IMO... bitmaps make the
filesize so much bigger that the SWF is no longer useful for the task it is
intended for: web animation. There are better products for non-web
based animation, so it makes me wonder what livemotion's purpose is.
I've tried livemotion, and without even a warning, it converts your work
to bitmaps the first time you try to use one of its 'effects'. It can
certainly do effects that flash cannot do, but the filesize is not
web-worthy, so the point of the SWF is totally missed.
Now if you stay away from the effects, you can stick with vectors and
match the filesizes of flash, but there is no reason for a veteran
flash-user
to make the switch. It seems that livemotion is just to bring adobe users
who have never used SWFs up to date, without having to learn something
new/better.
Don't even get me started on the lack of scripting...
:)
Gregg Caines
----- Original Message -----
From: "daniel gray" <danielgraymindspring [dot] com>
To: <flasherchinwag [dot] com>
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2000 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: FLASH: ZDNET's Comparison Flash v. LiveMotion
> Gary DeJarnett wrote:
>
> > In case anyone's interested in another article comparing Flash and
> > LiveMotion, here's another one:
> >
> > http://www.zdnet.com/devhead/stories/articles/0,4413,2495481,00.html
> > <http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?28610:1622836>
> >
> > I don't really agree with it because the author doesn't compare the size
of
> > the resulting files from each program.
>
> I dunno, Gary. I thought the article was pretty fair. He mentions the
> bitmap issue on
http://www.zdnet.com/devhead/stories/articles/0,4413,2495522,00.html
>
> The designer must have the discipline to stay away from the effects if
> file size is the ultimate issue. (Or smash things down with the
> per-object compression.)
>
> How much bigger are your LiveMotion SWFs than comparable Flash SWFs?
> I'd love to see a range of comparisons, vectors to vectors.
>
> Cheers,
> Dan
>
> http://geekbooks.com ------- blatant sig hype to follow -------------
>
> * "The Complete Guide to Associate and Affiliate Programs on the Net -
> Turning Clicks Into Cash" (McGraw-Hill) 100% Snake Oil Free!
>
> flasher is generously supported by...
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> flashforward2000 and The Flash Film Festival
> "The World's Premier Flash Solutions Conference and Expo"
> March 27-29, Nob Hill Masonic Center, San Francisco, California
>
> -Register before Feb 25 and save $200!!-- www.flashforward2000.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
> http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpchinwag [dot] com
>
flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flashforward2000 and The Flash Film Festival
"The World�s Premier Flash Solutions Conference and Expo"
March 27-29, Nob Hill Masonic Center, San Francisco, California
-Register before Feb 25 and save $200!!-- www.flashforward2000.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpchinwag [dot] com
Replies
Re: FLASH: ZDNET's Comparison Flash v. L, daniel gray
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]