Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | FLASH: plugin streaming / processor usage |
From: | Eric Bogs |
Date: | Sat, 16 Dec 2000 11:23:51 GMT |
I've been researching various sound/Flash combos ... after being impressed
with the audio and interactivity at Echo
(http://www.echo.com/index_invitation.jsp?ref=196453), I tried to take a
crack at my own Flash/audio interactivity.
If you check out my personal site, http://bo.gs/2, you might notice that I
actually use two Flash 5 plugin instances (that is, 2xOBJECT/EMBED).
There's one main one that handles the movie, and then one smaller one which
does nothing but stream the audio.
The reason that I had to use this second plugin was that everything was just
too slow, processor wise, when it was all lumped in to one plugin. When I
had one plugin doing the animations, loading variables, -and- loading and
playing the music SWF, it just ground to a halt.
I'm pretty pleased with the performance after switching to two plugins ...
just wanted to pass this on and see if anyone has any ideas why there would
be a difference in performance. Does the browser allocate more
memory/processor to each plugin instance?
-Eric
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flashforward2000 and the Flash(tm) Film Festival
November 27-29, 2000, LONDON, National Film Theatre
Produced by United Digital Artists and lynda.com
-Sponsored by Macromedia, Adobe Systems and Apple Computer
-http://www.flashforward2000.com or UK tel. +44 (0870) 751 1526
Register before November 10 and save �200
http:// www.flashforward2000.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpchinwag [dot] com
Replies
RE: FLASH: site check, Andrew Cotterell
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]