Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: HTML for Flash movies |
From: | Ben Rogers |
Date: | Wed, 18 Feb 1998 18:13:09 GMT |
Thanks for trying, we'll look into it.
In the meantime, since you certainly have a Flash capable browser, why not
try:
http://www.pepperhead.co.uk/bisa/ie_ns
-this will let you have direct access to the first page, without going
through the CGI script
I welcome any comments
Ben
Ben Rogers
Pepper Head Design (Hot Ideas) Ltd
http://www.pepperhead.co.uk
Email Disclaimer
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorised.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in
the governing Pepper Head Design client engagement letter.
benpepperhead [dot] co [dot] uk
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Gayton <webmasternetland [dot] fr>
To: flashershocker [dot] com <flashershocker [dot] com>
Date: Wednesday, February 18, 1998 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: HTML for Flash movies
Hello Ben,
I came from your site. Here is the situation for me (and i hope i'm alone).
Win95/NS4.03(fr) In my Windows95, .cgi files are defined to be opened by a
text
editor (to work on). I never had problem with this configuration to visit
sites
(using or not cgi files), but when i go to your, it trys to open pepper.cgi,
asks me if i want to open or save on disk. If i open it, my text editor
opens
the file. If i save it, i save it and...
SO I CANNOT ENTER INTO YOUR SITE !
Sorry.
Christian
Ben Rogers a �crit:
> I should clarify...
>
> I was responding to mail sent by Tommy Rainwater about Aftershock and how
> slow it was.
>
> Here's the story:
>
> I found that Aftershock by itself did not allow me a complete solution to
> the plugin problem, though it does generate some useful javascript code...
I
> used carefully selected & revised chunks of this code together with the
> "Smart Button" concept. I spent *hours* over it, trying to make a
foolproof
> way to ensure that people who did not have the Flash plugin would be
> detected correctly & have the minimum hassle downloading it.
>
> The entire result worked perfectly, except that it was unacceptably slow.
On
> accessing the first page, a grey page appeared for 20-30 seconds (with a
> 33600 connection ). I put this down to the fact that the browser had to
call
> MM *as well as* our site -every time- regardless of whether the user had
the
> plugin or not...
>
> Perhaps I should have been more specific and referred to the "Smart
Button"
> aspect of things, which is where the holdup was caused; specifically,
> accessing MM... So apologies for that.
>
> My impatience comes from the fact that I feel that I have wasted a great
> deal of time, on and off, redoing the intro's for our Flashed sites purely
> because of the plugin problem... And then to feel mislead by MM over the
> "Smart Button" issue just sent me over the top.
>
> I now have a mainly home-grown system which seems to work well (using a
mix
> of server-side perl, client-side javascript & a trick with a Flash movie)
>
> That said, I sincerely feel that Flash2 is the greatest single thing to
> happen to web site developers. Which is why I care so much about making
sure
> technicalities don't get in the way for those who browse Flashed sites.
>
> I'm looking forward to Flash3...
>
> Ben Rogers
> Pepper Head Design (Hot Ideas) Ltd
> http://www.pepperhead.co.uk
>
> Email Disclaimer
> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
privileged.
> It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone
else
> is unauthorised.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution
> or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
prohibited
> and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
> contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed
in
> the governing Pepper Head Design client engagement letter.
> benpepperhead [dot] co [dot] uk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Dowdell <jdowdellmacromedia [dot] com>
> To: flashershocker [dot] com <flashershocker [dot] com>
> Date: Tuesday, February 17, 1998 11:30 PM
> Subject: Re: HTML for Flash movies
>
> >At 9:22 AM 2/17/98, Ben Rogers wrote:
> >>It *is* too slow...
> >>It's a bit much, IMNSHO, that MM did not warn of this when they
> >>enthusiastically announced these two methods.
> >
> >
> >What, specifically, is slow for you?
> >
> >Is it the browser detection? The browser dynamic writes? The retrieval of
> >the external .JS archive for implementation? Is it the actual one-time
> >process of creating the HTML?
> >
> >Right now I'm not well able to scan the comment... what specific piece of
> >the process do you find slower than what you expect?
> >
> >jd
> >
> >
> >John Dowdell, Macromedia Tech Support, San Francisco CA US
> >
> >Private email options: http://www.macromedia.com/support/priority.html
> >Search technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
> >Search DIRECT-L: http://www.mcli.dist.maricopa.edu/director/digest/
> >Online savvy: http://search.yahoo.com/bin/search?p=netiquette
> >Cross-browser scripting resources: http://www.dhtmlzone.com/
> >
> >
> >
Replies
Re: HTML for Flash movies, sammy
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]