Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: [flasher] Nielsen on Flash; not bad actually
From: Kristopher Wainwright
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 05:17:58 -0000


Laughing ....

I can, for some strange reason, foresee alot of Jakob
Bashing again .... lol.

Kris Sends .....



--- Gahlord Dewald <gahlordatweedsmedia [dot] com> wrote:
> I thought you might all get a kick out of this. I'm
> still drinking out of my
> fuck->jakob_nielsen mug, mind you. But here's a
> quick bit from the standard:
>
>
>
> ====== Forwarded Message ======
> Date: 1/24/01 5:03 PM
> Received: 1/24/01 7:04 PM
> From: TheStandard.com
> <thestandards_buildatreply [dot] thestandard [dot] com>
> To: gahlordatweedsmedia [dot] com
>
> TIS: One of the things you've said is that 99
> percent of the time
> Flash is bad. But how do you differentiate between
> Flash as content
> and Flash in design?
>
> JN: I think the question is, Do you have content
> that lends itself
> well to an animated presentation? And often there
> is. Customer service
> would be a good example if you're showing someone
> how to repair some
> equipment. Unfortunately, this is theoretical. Right
> now, Flash is
> very rarely being used to actually communicate
> things. It's more used
> for showing off. Instead, you should animate some
> movement, or
> something that actually shows a change.
> ====== End Forwarded Message ======


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/



[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]