Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: RE: FLASH: OT: A Contradiction??
From: David
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 22:23:17 GMT

Hm, I was thinking more along the lines of layout colors, as opposed to
images such as jpg's and such. I was curious more in the sense of text,
background, border, table cell, etc. colors.

-DGL

-----Original Message-----
From: owneratchinwag [dot] com [owneratchinwag [dot] com]On">mailto:owneratchinwag [dot] com]On Behalf Of Neal
Cabage
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 5:58 AM
To: flasheratchinwag [dot] com
Subject: Re: FLASH: OT: A Contradiction??


Have you ever seen 16bit/24bit images on an AOL browser when
"image-compression" is on? I don't know what's up here - but I found out
while working on a site that AOL browsers come with this setting that
actually "compresses" images (basically looks like they're being displayed
at 8bit - aliases 'n all). I don't know what's "really" going on here and
was unable to obtain any specifics from AOL when prompted. All the same, a
friend told me (I rarely use AOL) that this setting is actually the default
setting on AOL browsers. Perhaps it would be good for someone knowing more
about this than I to comment more thoroughly. all the same, this is
potentially a good reason to stay with 8bit color whenever possible. And
that's before you get into the differences in files size comparing an 8bit
file, to a 16bit, or 24bit image (compression aside).

Neal

----- Original Message -----
From: David <davidatdglweb [dot] com>
To: <flasheratchinwag [dot] com>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 9:38 PM
Subject: FLASH: OT: A Contradiction??


According to discussion I've seen here and other places, my understanding is
that approximately 90% of those using the web today are able to view Flash
content. I noticed over on
http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2000/February/colors.html that currently
there are approximately 8% of those using the web today who are still under
256 8-bit color.

Assuming a margin for error and different numbers that different stat sites
may provide, it looks like there are "roughly" the same number of people who
cannot view Flash as who cannot view greater than 256 colors. However, I
think everyone agrees it's perfectly acceptable to use Flash, as the
percentage of those who cannot view Flash is rather small. Yet it seems
most people still feel you must use web safe colors even though the number
of people who cannot view more than 256 colors is about the same as those
who cannot view Flash. Does it not make sense that using more than 256
colors should work just as well as using Flash? 100% compatibility isn't
normally the goal (or we wouldn't use Flash, right?). Isn't it to get as
high a compatibly as possibly within reason?

Moving on to the Mac color versus PC color issue - this is where I need
help. I understand that within the 256 colors, there are 40 that are
displayed differently between a Mac and PC (what "differently" is, though, I
do not know as I do not own a Mac). However, does this "color discrepancy"
carry over to 24- or 32-bit color between Macs and PCs? If a Mac and PC are
both in 24- or 32-bit color, will there still be a significant number of
colors that are displayed in a dramatically different way?

-DGL


flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flashforward2000 and The Flash Film Festival
"The World's Premier Flash Solutions Conference and Expo"
March 27-29, Nob Hill Masonic Center, San Francisco, California

-Register before Feb 25 and save $200!!-- www.flashforward2000.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpatchinwag [dot] com




flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flashforward2000 and The Flash Film Festival
"The World�s Premier Flash Solutions Conference and Expo"
March 27-29, Nob Hill Masonic Center, San Francisco, California

-Register before Feb 25 and save $200!!-- www.flashforward2000.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpatchinwag [dot] com


flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flashforward2000 and The Flash Film Festival
"The World�s Premier Flash Solutions Conference and Expo"
March 27-29, Nob Hill Masonic Center, San Francisco, California

-Register before Feb 25 and save $200!!-- www.flashforward2000.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpatchinwag [dot] com


Replies
  Re: FLASH: OT: A Contradiction??, Neal Cabage

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]