Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | FLASH: RE: Flash3, Toy or serious designer tool? |
From: | Michael Coombs |
Date: | Wed, 28 Oct 1998 17:01:54 GMT |
D.Gary wrote, and I thank him...
>However I think a few things might need to be pointed out. For one: most
>FLash3
>sites still have that that sore "vector vs. jpg" thumb. THis means when
>tying in
>Vector images with imported jpgs, they usually dont complement one another
>since Vector is so crisp and images exported in Flash have awful "banding"
>habits.
I have just started in on Flash. I fulfill designs for a very creative art
director who uses
a lot of airbrushed gradients. I was shocked (excuse pun) to find out that
I had to
use Flash's jpg'ing and couldn't set up my jpgs in photoshop.
Why can't flash jpg a gradient without banding when photoshop can? Why
can't I link or import a file
that has been successfully jpg'ed in another program? or can I? Any help?
I agree with Gary, the flash sites are much too vector looking.
Look at the difference in these backgrounds:
No flash jpg: http://www.trilliumdesign.com/esi/noflash.html
Flash gradient: http://www.trilliumdesign.com/esi/
_______________________
Michael Coombs
Trillium
http://www.trilliumdesign.com
(530) 477-5777
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com
Replies
Re: FLASH: RE: Flash3, Toy or serious d, David Gary
Re: FLASH: RE: Flash3, Toy or serious d, John Croteau
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]