uk-netmarketing Archive (2011-2015)

Suzy,

There is nothing spammy about the correct implementation of permanent
redirects because content is being moved. This has the added benefit of
retaining the link reputation of the previous URLs.

But perhaps you should be asking your own 'experts':
http://emarketing-tactics.com/internet-marketing/search-engine-optimization/
This is pretty basic SEO, so I'm surprised it is something you are reaching
out for.

By the way, the rapid arrival of thousands of links and an equally quick
change in ranking are exactly the sorts of triggers that Google looks out
for when trying to filter out sites seeking to manipulate it. Do take care.

Steve
-- 

Steve Johnston
*Search:Johnston*


On 17 January 2013 19:44, Suzy Turnbull <sturnbull at teamgroup.biz> wrote:

> Hello Everyone,
>
> Happy New Year to you all.
>
> I am bit stuck on making the right White Hat SEO decision and I would be
> very grateful to hear from some of the SEO experts amongst the group re the
> following scenario:
>
> A Client has a site that has been on same domain for around 7 years.  The
> site was completely updated last year and many URLs remained the same.
>
> They had around 345 back links and following a recent campaign we
> increased that significantly to thousands of links and
> significantly improved their rankings for the main keywords (to first page
> of SERP results - from absolutely no-where to be seen!  Yeahhh – success!).
>
>
> Now they are building a new site on a new domain (not a sub-domain) on
> which they will host a chunk of the existing site.
>
> So here are the challenges:
>
> *1.  Re-directs:  *
> We will need to redirect people to the new pages on the new site.
>
> If we put in a 301 permanent redirect, Google may think we are spamming.
>  So therefore should we implement an intermediate page (404) with a new
> URL? Or is there another option?
>
> *2.  Link Building:*
> We want to mirror the link building we did on the original site.  That may
> mean that we get twice the links coming in from the same source - to the
> same organization.  Is this bad practice or would we need to implement a
> no–follow from the original links to the pages on the old site?
>
> Many thanks.
>
> Saludos!
>
> Suzy
>
> *Suzy Turnbull (Dip Dig M)*
> *Managing Director*
> *E: Marketing Tactics*
> *
> *
> *Email:       *sturnbull at emarketing-tactics.com
> *Web:         *http:// <http://emarketing-tactics.com>
> emarketing-tactics.com
> *Tel:            *+(507) 265 3508 | +(507) 6480 3623
> *Skype:*       suzyturnbull
> *Linked In: * http://pa.linkedin.com/in/suzyturnbull
> *
> *
> **
>
>
>
>
> ~~ Chinwag Jobs: Find your perfect new job or next team member ~~
>
> Chinwag Jobs is the leading specialist recruitment website for digital
> roles in the UK. Used by major companies such as BBC, Electronic
> Arts, Kingston University as well as the majority of recruitment
> agencies who place staff in the sector.
>
> Take a look through our listings or register to advertise your
> own vacancies today.
>
> >> CHINWAG JOBS: http://jobs.chinwag.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> You're subscribed to uk-netmarketing to change your options or
> unsubscribe: https://mm.chinwag.com/options/uk-netmarketing
>
> uk-netmarketing discussion list is powered by http://chinwag.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.chinwag.com/pipermail/uk-netmarketing/attachments/20130121/56360088/attachment.html>