uk-netmarketing Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | UKNM: Re: Protecting Children/Censorship |
From: | Rich_Bailey |
Date: | Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:43:39 GMT |
I fear people who want to ban everything they dont agree with I have not the
time or the right to say what should happen to such sites. I respeact the
way most of them use a credit card to prevent children (if your kids got
your credit card number there is going to be trouble anyway) and get money.
There are warning pages and laws differ but I do not agree with almost
anything in this reply (I know its a joke reply I just want to see if you
read this far). Its is almost impossable to block the net which means
people need to police the children not other adults.
A really good child ISP is maybe needed for my ten year old sister because
adults will be adults.
Richard Bailey
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom" <tomtui [dot] co [dot] uk>
To: <uk-netmarketingmail [dot] chinwag [dot] com>
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 8:21 AM
Subject: UKNM: Protecting Children/Censorship
> >Are we all forgetting what most children call a cat?
> >Try that word and see what happens.
> >After using this word (on an un-named meta based search engine):
> >I was shocked to find a site where I was two click away from one of 30
live
> >video feeds, which showed people doing everything, no credit card number
> >nothing the site also offered pics of children, for a price. I was
shocked
> >to think my 10 year old sister could find this site looking for innocent
> >things. If you want the URL e-mail me off list you don't want that on
the
> >list, its giving money to people promoting criminal acts. I feel its a
> >problem that is no going to go away on its own, human nature is such that
> >people will always want. Freedom verses protection of teenage minds that
> >will search such things out not anything I am going to go in to but a
site
> >like that one begs to be banned.
> >
> >Richard Bailey
>
> Thank heavens there are guardians of us all like you, Richard! We must of
> course give up any and all freedoms in the quest to protect The Fragile
> Teenage Mind. And thank heavens for the wholesome influences on teenagers,
> like the magazine industry which encourages gross materialism and offers
> advice on "How to keep your boyfriend" to 12-year old girls. Away with
this
> sinful and vulgar language! See what happens when "Kitty-cat" beomes a
> euphamism for "Bum-hole"? Live video feeds of twitching rusty bullet-holes
> wherever you look!
>
> This evil trade will of course be stopped immediately by the introduction
of
> bans amid the shrill shrieks of the righteous, just like the dirty mag.
> trade has been stopped from corrupting our youth by never being displayed
in
> newsagents, no longer being passed around school playgrounds, and by not
> allowing pornographers control of mainstream media, especially the Daily
> Express.
>
> Tom Dussek
>
> [Sam says: please note, I changed the subject line to make it easier to
> follow the thread.]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Finding it impossible to trawl through mountains of irrelevant
information on the web? Trying but failing to reach a niche market?
Help is at hand with the launch this week of online advertising
marketplace ADictive.com - the solution to all your advertising needs.
Visit http://www.adictive.com to find out more.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpchinwag [dot] com
Replies
Re: UKNM: Re: Protecting Children/Censor, Martin Lloyd
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]