[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: Broadvision
From: Danny O'Brien
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 14:42:43 GMT

On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 09:54:53AM +0000, Andrew Gilfrid Day wrote:
> Well this has probably been asked before but what do we all think of
> Broadvision? http://www.broadvision.com

http://www.peterme.com/bvsucks/
Pretty much sums up my opinion, based on some nightmarish
experiences in my past, and various friend's comments on
subsequent BV projects.


Points:

1. In my direct experience, BV used to really, *really*, suck. It's
got better since then.

2. It's got a steep learning curve, at the top of which
is a set of features that most programmers could implement with
simpler, more open systems like AOLServer, PHP or ASP. I've yet
to see a BV site that did something that you couldn't do more
easily, with less technology lock-in, with these widely-
available systems. If you have more sophisticated requirements,
(or clients that want something big and expensive to calm
their fears), StoryServer has more successful
implementation tales that you can learn from.
If you want a steep learning curve because you need to create
genuinely innovative solutions, I'd have a look at Zope, which
is relatively new, but appears well-engineered, and is open source,
or MediaSurface. I don't know much about these, but I've heard
good things.

3. I know this is tricky, but I'd ask *why* the client is so keen on BV,
since choosing the content management system should be a technical
decision (should be: sadly, CMS's tend to also limit the design
and workflow of a site. This shouldn't be the case, but they all do it.
My experience with BV suggests that it's worse than most.)
Anecdotal evidence suggests that BV tends to target sales
at the marketing and non-technical staff at prospective clients,
rather than the technical side. I'll draw no conclusions here.

4. Naturally, all of this is IMHO. All I really know is that
BV seems to provoke some *very* extreme reactions amongst
developers, and I've yet to hear a good story about it.
If someone wants to send me one, I'd be happy to pass it on.

5. Similarly, BV seems to have much more marketing bullshit at work
than comparable products. This doesn't mean it's necessarily
a bad piece of software, but it sets my warning lights blinking,

> I ask due to possible client wishing to use it, and apart from all the
> marketing b-sh*t there is v.little on their site about technical/ support
> overheads/requirements.
>
> So.. can any one help?
>
> Thanks
> Andrew


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
post new media vacancies for free uknm-jobsatchinwag [dot] com
*******************
sponsor the uk-netmarketing list and website, contact
salesatchinwag [dot] com for more details.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



Replies
  Re: UKNM: Broadvision, Andy Theyers

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]