[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: UKNM: RE: UKNM Digest V1 #363
From: John Braithwaite
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:10:15 GMT

Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 18:16:38 +0000
From: Stefan Magdalinski <stefanatisness [dot] org>
Subject: Re: UKNM: Kozmo

Martin Phillips wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Braithwaite <JohnBatGBGdirect [dot] com>
> To: <uk-netmarketingatmail [dot] chinwag [dot] com>
> Sent: 18 January 2000 10:21
> Subject: UKNM: Kozmo
>
> > The moral of the story is: If you see a potential threat, buy it!
> >
> > This is the first of many - I see companies in the future binning the
R&D
> > departments and just 'buying' their next products as companies and
then
> > integrating them. If it works for CISCO and others....
>
> The whole pc industry started that way. Microsoft didn't write
> PC-DOS, they bought it in. And if this is the future, it's also the past
- a
> return to the days when independent inventors came up with ideas and sold
them to
> companies.

I've read business plans for californian startups that have acquisition
by a threatened named monopolist (/market leader) as the explicit exit
strategy. it's legit. and not new at all

> plus ca change...
>
> Martin Phillips
> MBI Danbury Mint

JB writes:

Did I say 'new'?

All I have noticed is an even larger shift towards this end - companies
'buying' bits (or wholes!) of others when they see a good product. Is it
legit? Yes. Is it healthy? Time will tell...


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
post new media vacancies for free uknm-jobsatchinwag [dot] com
*******************
sponsor the uk-netmarketing list and website, contact
salesatchinwag [dot] com for more details.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



Replies
  Re: UKNM: RE: UKNM Digest V1 #363, Stefan Magdalinski

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]