[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: Re Freeserve
From: Jo Chipchase
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:27:59 +0100


>Example of a poor site - www.waterstones.co.uk - how can a company that
>has re-designed a site three times in six months still get it so
>painfully wrong?? (Poor use of colours, frames and brains).

It's not *that* bad - ok, so the frameset is a bit cumbersome (it's
acceptable on 1024 x 768 res), but at least the site doesn't have lots of
distracting Flash on the home page, etc. I'm not to keen on the colours...
but I think most of us will have seen worse !
_____________________________________
CAN-U-HACK-IT
Internet & Publicity Services
http://www.can-u-hack-it.com
********************
UKNM is sponsored by Excite UK, visit us at http://www.excite.co.uk.
Email Khalil Ibrahimi khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com (mailto:khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com) to advertise on Excite.
********************
Change your UKNM subscription use http://www.chinwag.com/uknm.html



Replies
  UKNM: Frames at 1024*768, Charles Meaden

Replies
  UKNM: Re Freeserve, John Braithwaite

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]