uk-netmarketing Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: UKNM: Just35.com - what do you think? |
From: | Richard Longhurst |
Date: | Sat, 22 Jul 2000 10:14:04 +0100 |
I was going to let this lie [what's on the end of the stick, Vic?], but...
> > What has the World come to when one gets attacked for trying to do some
> > good, we are one of the only search tools available that if you type in
> > 'sex' the only matches you will get are for Essex or Sussex.
I'm sure readers will be surprised to hear that Roger is mistaken in this regard. Viz, SexyShoes.co.uk and Agent Provocateur all turn up on a search for 'sex'. I'm sure Tony Blair and David Blunkett wouldn't want my children visiting these sites through Just35.com.
Of course, I had to have a good look round Sexy Shoes to see if it was suitable for children and it is -- the 'Silver top genuine horse whip' will be just the thing for cowboys and Indians, and no doubt the 'Three fingered studded spanking paddle' will replace the feared slipper in many a public school beating. And don't all school uniforms require high-heeled thigh-length boots? (Makes the lingerie section in the Littlewoods catalogue look a bit tame, eh frustrated teenagers?)
All the best,
Richard
--
Richard Longhurst - 2020Shops - www.2020shops.com -- online shopping made easy
Win great prizes now! http://www.2020shops.com/prizes.asp
rlonghurst2020shops [dot] com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Bradley" <simonbibliotech [dot] net>
To: <uk-netmarketingchinwag [dot] com>
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: UKNM: Just35.com - what do you think?
> "On that note, Just35.com will soon be the main search facility used in all
> schools across the UK because of the above reason."
>
> Lets hope that if you do then you get someone else to write the copy, your
> spelling would not make it 8:)
>
> Roger wrote:
>
> > Richard,
> >
> > What makes you think that we had not informed thesite.org.uk why we had
> > rejected their listing?
> > I am simply repling to his original email, if he didnt want the issue
> > broadcast then he wouldnt have submitted comments on this list nor would
> he
> > have taken the time to send press releases to all major newspapers,
> > undoubtedly trying to drum up some interest in his site by accusing us of
> > unfairly rejecting his link.
> > What has the World come to when one gets attacked for trying to do some
> > good, we are one of the only search tools available that if you type in
> > 'sex' the only matches you will get are for Essex or Sussex.
> > Although this might be a turn off for the more perverce internet user, but
> > as a mother or father this is a very satisfying and comferting tool.
> > On that note, Just35.com will soon be the main search facility used in all
> > schools across the UK because of the above reason.
> > Surely the fact that we are actually rejecting 'paid for links' suggests
> > that we wont be the '35 best payers' as some of you have implied.
> >
> > Roger Fenton
>
> [Sam says: message chopped]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
the UK's totally managed affiliate marketing solution.
ukaffiliates.com >> the net.working
http://www.ukaffiliates.com / salesukaffiliates [dot] com (mailto:salesukaffiliates [dot] com)
telephone: 020 7691 1880 / fax: 020 7691 1881
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpchinwag [dot] com
Replies
Re: UKNM: Just35.com - what do you think, Simon Bradley
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]