[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: More webwashing
From: Charlie.Williams
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 13:48:17 +0100

Charlie Williams@ECSOFT
18/05/99 10:38

Rick wrote:
>>Charlie Williams said:
>> It seems to have crossed the
>>line that seperates info sites with an acceptable number of banners from
>>banner sites with a bit of info at the bottom of each page.
>
>How many are OK? Don't you only get one ad on the page?

You get a standard banner across the top, plus an big ad-stuffed column
down the right flank.

>> Before the
>>re-design it looked fairly okay, ie: nondescript as a text-based info site
>>should be, plus a couple of easily-ignorable banners. Now it just looks
>>shite.
>>
>>This is what happens when web designers assume users don't mind ads.
>
>Not really sure why shite web design means the ads on the site should be
>blamed.

We're talking about delivery of text-based info (Usenet posts). Essentially
the simplest of designs is all that's required. However, when ads are added
to the mix, a whole lot more thought needs to go into page layout. Trying
too hard to fit the ads in has compromised the user interface. IMHO.

Charlie.

********************
UKNM is sponsored by Excite UK, visit us at http://www.excite.co.uk.
Email Khalil Ibrahimi khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com (mailto:khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com) to advertise on Excite.
********************
Change your UKNM subscription use http://www.chinwag.com/uknm.html



[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]