Re: UKNM: Is it just me....

[Richard Bailey]

From: Martin Lloyd <

martindomino [dot] com

>

Wrote:

So we can conclude

that :-


0.2% of porn sites include the word Barbie

0.0005% of porn sites are actually Barbie related pornography

0.004% of Barbie sites are pornographic in content



In one word; no.

Or did you check each and every result?

Were all the porn searches porn sites?

And were all the Barbie sites toy sites?


Richard Bailey

Assumption is the mother of all...



----- Original Message ----- 

From: Martin Lloyd <

martindomino [dot] com

>

To: <

uk-netmarketingchinwag [dot] com

>

Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 9:50 AM

Subject: RE: UKNM: Is it just me....



> Hmm, time for some serious research ;-)

> 

> If we try searching for porn and barbie on Google we get 16 500 results,

> searching for "Porn Barbie" yields 29 results, searching for porn yields

> 5.98m results and searching for barbie yields 628 000. So we can conclude

> that :-

> 

> 0.2% of porn sites include the word barbie

> 0.0005% of porn sites are actually barbie related pornography

> 0.004% of barbie sites are pornographic in content

> 

> Of course this doesn't allow for porn stars called Barbie, suggesting the

> real incidence of childrens toy themed porn is even lower.

> 

> Serious news story or scaremongering? Its your call.

> 

> Regards

> 

> Martin Lloyd

> STRATEGIST

> domino.com



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

   Seminars, exhibitions, networking events, parties, conferences.

        Finding it difficult to keep up and plan ahead?


    Sign up for Chinwag's weekly new media events newsletter,

   all the events you need to know about, direct to your inbox.


   http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing/e_index.shtml

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to

http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or

helpchinwag [dot] com