[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: Free ISPs Vs. Paying ISPs (Don't Mention Dixons)
From: Nigell Boulton
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 14:59:44 +0100

Perhaps the 0800 dialup numbers are not such a bad idea.

I think BT should offer free local calls for everyone, but maybe have a
small charge for data calls, like 10p per call

-----Original Message-----
From: Sajid Mohammed <g23atrocketmail [dot] com>
To: uk-netmarketingatchinwag [dot] com <uk-netmarketingatchinwag [dot] com>
Date: 06 October 1998 14:25
Subject: UKNM: Free ISPs Vs. Paying ISPs (Don't Mention Dixons)


>Hello,
>
>The fortunes of the ISP industry have changed rapidly over the last
>couple of weeks, with the launch of FreeServe &
>BTClickPlusWe'veBeenHammeredByOftelAndDixons. Soon, we will see the
>launch of C&W's own free (?) service as well - I'm sure others are
>looking at this market also.
>
>Especially as apparently a whopping 66% of domestic PC users aren't on
>the Net - is this really true? Also, it appears ON Digital (the mooks)
>are not going be offering web access via their box - they won't be
>offering access to Sky Digital's EPG either, but that's another
>story...I think it's a bad move on ON Digital not to support the Web,
>which is established and has an audience. Something you can't really
>say about Digital TV yet.
>
>Which means that there's going to be an almighty feeding frenzy like
>the early days of ISPs - remember how EasyNet aquired loads of small
>ISPs that had gone bust or weren't doing too well? I can see that
>history will repeat itself, first as tragedy, then as farce.
>
>Obviously, the paid-for ISPs have to move up the value chain. Already,
>they can legitimately say that by offering free unlimited tech support
>and not levying a surcharge on the cost of your call to the POP that
>they have a higher-value proposition. Also, it's been rumoured for
>several days that Virgin.Net are planning to go 0800 on their dial-up
>access. Which to my eyes adds value to their proposition.
>
>But how else can ISPs outmanouver the free ISP mob? Providing portal
>content, e-commerce, Quake servers and streaming media etc. etc. is
>all very well and good. But where are paying ISPs wanting at the
>moment?
>Personally, I just want super-fast access. Any ISP that wanted to
>offer me a dirt-cheap ISDN or leased line would get my interest - but
>I can't see that happening anytime soon.

>
>It may even come to pass that most paying ISPs mutate/aggregate into
>business-to-business services organisations, offering large scale
>connectivity for companies tied into bespoke Intranet/Extranet
>solutions using Notes/Domino or whatever - leaving the free ISPs to
>the consumers.
>
>What services would people like to see the paid-for ISPs provide -
>which could differentiate them from the free ISPs?
>
>
>Sajid Mohammed
>
>
>http://www.youcanthelpbutgetthefeelingthattheresacertaincachetabouthavingau
rlafteryournameattheendofanemail.com/buticantgetoverlyexcitedabouttheprospec
t.html/
>_________________________________________________________
>DO YOU YAHOO!?
>
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]