[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]

Subject: RE: UKNM: Search Engines
From: Chris Meachin
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 13:02:21 +0100

> Have I missed something here? Doesn't / didn't Agency.com
> represent British
> Airways (among others) for banner advertising placement.

I fail to see the relevance: My views are not representative of the company
I work for. They're just my own.

Or do I have to start including a legal disclaimer/writing from a Hotmail
account now?

Surely people are less likely to post to lists such as this if their remarks
are taken as press-releases.

> Or for "banner advertising sucks" should I read "we couldn't work
> out quite
> how to do banner advertising so we just came up with some glib excuses
> instead"?

No. I've (happily) never had anyhting to do with a banner advertising
production or development in my current job. Although I do have experience
with the (lack of) results from banner advertising elsewhere.

Must we start slagging off each others employers, or are you able to offer a
rational counter-argument instead?

Please convince me...

The biggest, best Chinwag Networking party...ever...
**27th September 2000** put it in your diaries now
RSVP to http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing/party.shtml
To sponsor the event email spareanychangeatchinwag [dot] com

generously supported by...
*** DoubleClick *** http://www.doubleclick.net
The leading provider of comprehensive global Internet
advertising solutions for marketers and Web publishers.
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com

  Re: UKNM: Search Engines, Ray Taylor
  Re: UKNM: Search Engines, Sam Carrington

  Re: UKNM: Search Engines, Ray Taylor

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]