uk-netmarketing Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | RE: UKNM: Search Engines |
From: | Chris Meachin |
Date: | Tue, 26 Sep 2000 13:02:21 +0100 |
> Have I missed something here? Doesn't / didn't Agency.com
> represent British
> Airways (among others) for banner advertising placement.
I fail to see the relevance: My views are not representative of the company
I work for. They're just my own.
Or do I have to start including a legal disclaimer/writing from a Hotmail
account now?
Surely people are less likely to post to lists such as this if their remarks
are taken as press-releases.
> Or for "banner advertising sucks" should I read "we couldn't work
> out quite
> how to do banner advertising so we just came up with some glib excuses
> instead"?
No. I've (happily) never had anyhting to do with a banner advertising
production or development in my current job. Although I do have experience
with the (lack of) results from banner advertising elsewhere.
Must we start slagging off each others employers, or are you able to offer a
rational counter-argument instead?
Please convince me...
C.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The biggest, best Chinwag Networking party...ever...
**27th September 2000** put it in your diaries now
RSVP to http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing/party.shtml
To sponsor the event email spareanychangechinwag [dot] com
generously supported by...
*** DoubleClick *** http://www.doubleclick.net
The leading provider of comprehensive global Internet
advertising solutions for marketers and Web publishers.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpchinwag [dot] com
Replies
Re: UKNM: Search Engines, Ray Taylor
Re: UKNM: Search Engines, Sam Carrington
Replies
Re: UKNM: Search Engines, Ray Taylor
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]