RE: UKNM: Re: Online advertorial

[Tony Newland]

As long as it does what it says on the box, I'll sell it. okay, maybe that's

an oversimplification, but aslong as the prodcut in itself is not deceitful

in its claims, there is proper fulfillment and no one is "stung" and the

advert/advertorial/promotion isn't boring so as to drive my users away, gets

some horrendous click through like 0.5% and makes my site look trash, I will

carry it. Flagged up as advertorial or not. I thank you. ;-) <shocked at

myself for having standards, when the hell did that happen?>

ATB

Tony "show me the money" newland.


> Tony Newland

> Advertising & Sponsorship Manager

> Rainbow Network Plc

> phone: 0207 278 1105

> fax: 0207 713 7732

> web: http://www.rainbownetwork.com

>

> Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author only and do

not necessarily represent the views of RAINBOW NETWORK PLC.

>

>



-----Original Message-----

From: Sam Carrington [

samcsensei [dot] co [dot] uk (mailto:samcsensei [dot] co [dot] uk)

]

Sent: 26 September 2000 15:52

To:

uk-netmarketingchinwag [dot] com

Subject: Re: UKNM: Re: Online advertorial



I would be inclined to take the middle way - advertorial can appear as

both 'marked' and 'unmarked' (IMHO) how would you describe the

Adidas/Lee Evans Olympics shorts described in the Guardian last week.

They are not marked as adverts, contain no adidas branding, run as 1

minute shorts in the olympics feed and even appeared on the BBC. They

BBC are apparently even considering packaging all the slots into one

longer slot  to run in the future. They are effective

lifestyle/editorial content and the only reference they make to adidas

is with the track suits which Mr Evans and his co-conspirators are

sporting.

What about the PS2 campaign mentioned in the same article. No branding,

just an evocative image and a slogan designed to pique curiosity and

encourage debate.


However press content does, I agree, usually get marked with

'advertisment' or 'promotion'. For now at least. Lets hope the adidas

campaign doesn't set too attractive a precedent. But I fear it has.


Remind me again why soap opera is so called, and how it originated. Oh

yeah - thats right. They were invented for the purposes of selling soap.

So TV returns to its roots.


Fiona Campbell-Howes wrote:

>

> I beg to differ - I've written advertorials for clients and they are

always

> clearly marked as "promotion" or "advertisement" when they are published.

> They are just long-copy print adverts, which is why clients often get

their

> PRs to write them rather than their ad agencies. You see them in women's

> magazines all the time too, and they are never presented as or mistaken

for

> editorial.

>


--

    sam carrington  //  senior web developer  //  sensei.co.uk



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  The biggest, best Chinwag Networking party...ever...

    **27th September 2000**  put it in your diaries now

 RSVP to http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing/party.shtml

  To sponsor the event email

spareanychangechinwag [dot] com

               generously supported by...

  *** DoubleClick ***      http://www.doubleclick.net

  The leading provider of comprehensive global Internet

 advertising solutions for marketers and Web publishers.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to

http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or

helpchinwag [dot] com