Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: FLASH: The model agency thing
From: Samir
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 08:58:06 +0100

Hey Lena,

You are pretty much right about the model's looks and professionality and I
do agree that the location / clothing did not support their major budget. I
have had a similar feeling about this since the time he said to keep the
names a "secret" and did not mention his own / clients details. Even I feel
the same that he has nothing to do with any beuru; I feel he is an artist
looking for "inspiration" in creating the material he is claiming to
freelance out. Especially if u read his other "design-tip" mail which was
quite pathetic!

Samir,
@rtaffects
-----Only 5 months left to the new millennium.... Is your site Flash
ready?-----
----- Original Message -----
From: Lena Bj�rklund <lena [dot] bjorklundatmbox304 [dot] swipnet [dot] se>
To: <flasheratshocker [dot] com>
Sent: Friday, August 20, 1999 11:38 AM
Subject: FLASH: The model agency thing


> In late spring there was an announcement of a flashdesigning project for
> a model agency bureau at this forum. It was followed by a quite animated
> discussion concerning the ways to compete in order to get a contract. In
> this case it seemed to be a quite beneficial one, whit a budget esteemed
> to 150.000 us $, by Glenn Folkvord, who calls himself a "messenger boy"
> for this bureau. Flashartist where invited to create a "testmovie" (one
> of the approx 200 that was planned to be produced), unpayed - but with a
> decent chance to get, what it seemed, a fun and wellpayed working
> opportunity.
>
> Naively enough (?), I signed up for this project...I must say, I was
> quite astonished when seeing the photographical material showing a model
> (?) named Tina, delivered by this bureau, because it bare no or very
> little resemblance in quality to what you would expect from a bureau
> with such a budget. In spite of this hesitation, I started to
> sketchingwork with the pieces of it I found worth while the labour.
>
> Now, Glenn F stated in one of his mails concerning this, that the name
> of the bureau was going to be kept secret until a certain time, "for the
> sake of trying to stay ahead of their competitors". Quite reasonable,
> maybe. But, as I questioned him in a mess some days ago now, "I�m
> convinced that the bureau people doesn�t expect the flashartists to
> deliver their original work to an anonymous employer in spe". I also
> asked for his respond to this, but haven`t received any as yet.
>
> Has anybody else on this list any experiences in this matter, that they
> would like to share? I think it would be a good thing casting some light
> on this - especially if the whole thing turns out to be a cheat and no
> bureau exist IRL.
>
> Lena Bj�rklund - overconspicious?
> http://home.swipnet.se/lena_b
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
> email to list-manageratshocker [dot] com. Problems to: owneratshocker [dot] com
> N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
> For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratshocker [dot] com
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-manageratshocker [dot] com. Problems to: owneratshocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratshocker [dot] com


Replies
  RE: FLASH: The model agency thing, Jeff Boucher

Replies
  RE: FLASH: Flash: Kicking off a QT movie, Vega, Eric
  Re: FLASH: Flash: Kicking off a QT movie, John Croteau
  Re: FLASH: Funny Flash Site, L. Olander
  FLASH: The model agency thing, Lena Bj�rklund

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]