RE: FLASH: The model agency thing

[Daniel Votino]

>As a commercial photographer, there is no way in hell as a

'professional' that I

>would continue work on that project. This deal seems to have an 'odor'

about it,

>big time.  When I compete or bid on photo shoots, never has any agency

held

>their names back to 'make it fair' - what's the point? If they were an

agency

>worth working for, it would only bring the cream of the crop out to do

the

>project. I wouldn't touch this with a 10 foot pole.

>Cheers,

>Jeff�


concur, 

after looking at the photos, i think we all agreed that the combination

of not releasing a name and the poor photography, did not leave us with

a feeling we would be doing a demo project for a company with a 150G

budget.


clearly, a company with that much money to spend on web developmnet

would

not have released photgraphy of a non-professional quality simply

because

"the photgrapher who was booked, didn't show up."  not a good story and

far

from real world.


~d


------------------------------------------------------------------------

To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an

email to

list-managershocker [dot] com

.  Problems to:

ownershocker [dot] com

N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.

For info on digest mode send: info flasher to

list-managershocker [dot] com