RE: FLASH: [OT] PC Memory

[Jason Cartwright]

You people should really run NT4 or even better 2k - its soooooooo much more

stable.


The downside is that I would not think of running less than 160Mb of RAM

with it (what my laptop has - and that starts thrashing when pushed) - 265

is preferable


Jas


> -----Original Message-----

>

From: Paul Willoughby [paul_willoughbybeap [dot] co [dot] uk (mailto:paul_willoughbybeap [dot] co [dot] uk)]

> Sent: 01 August 2000 14:16

> To: Flasher-l (E-mail)

> Subject: FW: FLASH: [OT] PC Memory

> 

> 

> Lars wrote:

> >Our IT people say that windows 95/98 won't actually use any 

> more than 128

> MB

> >or RAM...

> 

> Do you know where this information came from? Is there 

> somewhere I can check

> it out on one of Microsofts site? I have looked and can find 

> no mention of

> this problem. I ask because I've just ordered PIII 750, 256Mb RAM with

> Windows 98 SE, and I don't want to spend the extra hundred 

> quid for the 256

> upgrade if it's going to serve no useful purpose.

> 

> Thanks in advance

> 

> Paul

> 

> 

> 

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

>  Full flasher archive now available online at:

>  http://www.chinwag.com/flasher/archive.shtml

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to

>

http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpchinwag [dot] com

> 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 Full flasher archive now available online at:

 http://www.chinwag.com/flasher/archive.shtml

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to

http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email

helpchinwag [dot] com