Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: RE: FW: FLASH: [OT] PC Memory
From: Gerred Gilronan
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 16:17:50 +0100

>From what I understand windows 2000 will require a 'minimum' of 128k to run.
Windows 98 and NT run 'efficiently' on 64K, depending on what you are using it
for. Obviously CAD work requires as much RAM as you can get.
You can never have enough RAM.

Gerred

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Willoughby [SMTP:paul_willoughbyatbeap [dot] co [dot] uk]
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2000 2:16 PM
To: Flasher-l (E-mail)
Subject: FW: FLASH: [OT] PC Memory

Lars wrote:
>Our IT people say that windows 95/98 won't actually use any more than 128
MB
>or RAM...

Do you know where this information came from? Is there somewhere I can check
it out on one of Microsofts site? I have looked and can find no mention of
this problem. I ask because I've just ordered PIII 750, 256Mb RAM with
Windows 98 SE, and I don't want to spend the extra hundred quid for the 256
upgrade if it's going to serve no useful purpose.

Thanks in advance

Paul



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Full flasher archive now available online at:
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher/archive.shtml
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpatchinwag [dot] com



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Full flasher archive now available online at:
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher/archive.shtml
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpatchinwag [dot] com


[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]