Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: sitecheck http://www.krysanthemum.com
From: Kumi Chamberlin
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 03:25:30 -0000

yeah, some of the stuff is processor intensive, and it looks choppy on my
power mac 8600, too. i like having my slow machine cuz it keeps me reminded
not everyone has a powerful computer, but most of my audience (design
companies) have newer, faster machines than mine..

> From: "flasher digest" <flasheratlists [dot] chinwag [dot] com>
> Reply-To: "flasher" <flasheratlists [dot] chinwag [dot] com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 00:00:01 -0000
> To: "flasher digest recipients" <flasheratlists [dot] chinwag [dot] com>
> Subject: flasher digest: February 19, 2001
>
> Subject: Re: sitecheck http://www.krysanthemum.com
> From: Anthony Smith <anthonyatvisualpurple [dot] com [dot] au>
> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:25:31 +1100
> X-Message-Number: 29
>
> on 20/2/01 4:01 AM, Kumi Chamberlin at kumiatbellatlantic [dot] net wrote:
>
>> hi, i have an experimental flash website that i've been working on for the
>> second year, but i would like to get your opinions/suggestions/criticism so
>> that i can further improve it. sometimes i get some people saying they had
>> trouble navigating, that it was not clear, etc., etc. so please feel free to
>> tell me whatever you thought about it, ANY input is appreciated.
>>
>
> its a great looking site.. tho i did have trouble getting around.. but it
> didnt take long to figure out.. the only real criticism i can level at it
> is that it really chugged on my g3.. but it is an old one :)
>
> 8_b!t_b@y




[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]