Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: FLASH: A word about tutorials |
From: | Kenneth C. Sherwood |
Date: | Fri, 8 Jan 1999 06:53:04 GMT |
Marc Hoffman wrote:
> What's going on here? A newcomer makes a perfectly valid point about some
> weaknesses in tutorials and next thing he's the target of defensiveness and
> sarcasm? I come to this list for honest feedback, among other things. If
> all I wanted was glowing praise, I'd call my mother on the phone. Please
> don't trash this list by discouraging or punishing honesty.
>
> Thank you.
Hi Mark,
You must be the Hall Monitor around here.
Good. Every NG needs one. Nice work.
> At 11:38 PM 1/7/99 -0500, you wrote:
*** The "you" above refers to me, Ken Sherwood. *I* wrote the following. ***
> >Hi Tim,
> >
> >I notice that you need a quick "tutorial" on common form when responding to
> >posts . . . leaving previous stuff in, etc. Maybe someone here can refer you
> to
> >a Web site where you can find that.
In case it's not obvious to everyone, I wrote that without a shred of
defensiveness or sarcasm.
I was offering Tim some honest feedback.
Sincerely,
Ken Sherwood
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com
Replies
RE: FLASH: A word about tutorials, Timothy Palmer-Benson
Re: FLASH: A word about tutorials, Marc Hoffman
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]