Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: FLASH: Tweening a line |
From: | John Croteau |
Date: | Fri, 29 Jan 1999 19:58:39 GMT |
Hi Angelique,
> Thanks, everyone, for your helpful advice. It ended up being an excellent
> exercise to make a growing line using each of the four methods you
> mentioned. Here's a question: what are the relative merits of
> shape-tweening a line and motion-tweening a filled rectangle? Is one more
> memory intensive than the other?
Don't know. why don't you do a test. Put each in a movie clip and you'll
need at least 20 copies. 100 would be better. Then time the 2 versions.
> I assume that masking is indeed more
> memory intensive, since it takes two layers.
Masking is indeed more processor intensive but not because it takes 2
layers.
Layers are always removed when the swf file is exported and generally
cost no bytes or processor time.
----------- -----------------------
John Croteau croteauerols [dot] com (mailto:croteauerols [dot] com)
------------- -------------------------
FlashTek (Advanced Websites with Flash) http://www.FlashTek.com/
Flash Bible (Fast track to good Flash) http://www.FlashBible.com/
Flash Central(The Universe Starts Here) http://www.FlashCentral.com/
The Flash Tech Resource (Tech Notes) http://www.FlashCentral.com/tech/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com
Replies
FLASH: Tweening a line, Angelique Gulermovich Eps
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]