Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Nielsen on Flash; not bad actually
From: Gahlord Dewald
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 16:21:42 -0000

I thought you might all get a kick out of this. I'm still drinking out of my
fuck->jakob_nielsen mug, mind you. But here's a quick bit from the standard:



====== Forwarded Message ======
Date: 1/24/01 5:03 PM
Received: 1/24/01 7:04 PM
From: TheStandard.com <thestandards_buildatreply [dot] thestandard [dot] com>
To: gahlordatweedsmedia [dot] com

TIS: One of the things you've said is that 99 percent of the time
Flash is bad. But how do you differentiate between Flash as content
and Flash in design?

JN: I think the question is, Do you have content that lends itself
well to an animated presentation? And often there is. Customer service
would be a good example if you're showing someone how to repair some
equipment. Unfortunately, this is theoretical. Right now, Flash is
very rarely being used to actually communicate things. It's more used
for showing off. Instead, you should animate some movement, or
something that actually shows a change.
====== End Forwarded Message ======

Gahlord Dewald
Weeds Media Consortium
Hoops of Fire. Dancing Bears.
Interactive Designers.
http://www.weedsmedia.com

v: 802.658.4267 x 1
f: 800.863.9606
e: gahlordatweedsmedia [dot] com

Weeds Media Consortium
416 Pine Street
Burlington, VT 05401
USA





[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]