Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: Flash Crawls |
From: | Craig Ferrante |
Date: | Thu, 9 Jul 1998 16:13:41 +0100 |
David Gary wrote:
> Craig Ferrante wrote:
>
> > I've recently stopped and tested different flash sites on different
> > computer systems
> > and was wondering if I could get some feedback on Flash performance.I
> > tested many sites including Gabocorp,SmashingIdeas and so on etc. and
> > noticed on any machine
> > below a pentium 166 Flash performance is almost unacceptable and
> > unbearable.Don't
> > get me wrong I think Flash3 is great and I am enjoying learning its many
> > features and
> > capabilities.The question is I don't see many sites with recommended
> > requirements
> > for processor speed,memory,etc. Are there any guidelines that developers
> > here
> > use to gauge site performance? -And are there any system requirement
> > guidelines
> > from macromedia that can be posted on the site? After doing some
> > research its amazing
> > how many people still have not upgraded their computers even with prices
> > so low.
> > Just wondering how some of you think about this during sites your
> > developing.
> > Is the cost of Flash admission Pentium200 or higher?
> >
> > Thanks in Advance
> > Curious Craig Ferrante
> > meanrabbit.com
> >
>
> HIya Craig,
>
> Ive seen very smooth animations on my ole "tester" p133. The animation speed
> depends
> on how much animation is happening at one time. Most designers (including
> myself) make the
> very simple mistake of "over doing it". When you've developed for CD-rom and
> 3dAnimation with
> AVI and different video formats, you tend to outdue some of the more lowly
> processors when developing
> in Flash. Another thing that chugs the prosessor is the "alpha" option in
> FLash3 and tweening gradients
> and animating objects with detail. When designing for the "general public"
> its probably a good idea
> to animate using solid colors and fonts and use your design experience to
> make it interesting and professional.
>
> Of course even the 166s are now considered the low standard. We bought 2
> p233 about 6 months ago and
> they're becoming dinosaurs quick! Oh well, thats technology.
>
> -DG-
>
> The've all killed themselves to reach the mothership in time before it
> passed the earth. They were highly intellegent!
> They worked on computers and had a website.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hi David,
Thanks for the prompt reply.I am going to rethink the way I've been
approaching animating in flash to tone it down.Its to bad to because if never
seen a program with
such advanced graphic features like transparency and tweening.The weird part
is
I drive myself crazy to get symbol size down and its still not enough.I
guess Flash
is a little ahead of its time in a land of dinosaurs.
Thanks again
Craig Ferrante
meanrabbit.com
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
> email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com
> N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
> For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com
Replies
Flash Crawls, Craig Ferrante
Re: Flash Crawls, David Gary
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]