Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: FLASH: MC vs. timeline question
From: Russell E. Unger
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 03:51:00 +0100

IMHO, it is better to do this for reusability. I would say that it depends
upon where you plan on placing the navigation MCs, but I personally use it
to really only have to do that portion of the layout once.

When the timelines and MC's start getting trickier and there's a lot going
on, it's sometimes easier *for me* to label each MC and know that's been
taken care of.

Hope that makes sense coming from me...

Russ
-----Original Message-----
From: Ulrich Sinn <anulsinnatpacbell [dot] net>
To: flasheratshocker [dot] com <flasheratshocker [dot] com>
Date: Monday, July 05, 1999 9:38 PM
Subject: FLASH: MC vs. timeline question


>I just finished the tutorial from the manual. Are there some objective
>reasons to go with movieclips for navigation rather than having
>conditions set up for jumps in the time line (with quasi-scenes)?
>
>Faster? Smaller? Easier?
>
>Thank you,
>
>U.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
>email to list-manageratshocker [dot] com. Problems to: owneratshocker [dot] com
>N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
>For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratshocker [dot] com
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-manageratshocker [dot] com. Problems to: owneratshocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratshocker [dot] com

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]