Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: FLASH: RE: Macs and market share Question
From: Frederico
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 09:57:36 +0100

On 7/12/1999 2:12 AM, Kevin Jackson via kjacksonattriskelian [dot] com, said:

>Does it really make any sense to design for the MAC viewer? Your cost
>benefit ratio would have to be off the planet...
>I ask the question because I would have a tough time (if the numbers are
>accurate) telling a customer that it makes economic sense to even consider
>designing for a MAC or any MAC related issues. If FLASH had an installed
>base of 2% we'd be nuts to use it.
>If the numbers were reversed can any MAC user tell me they would design for
>the PC? Thier is a huge preponderance of PC users and it's hard to get
>someone on a MAC to even name their files for PC use, so I doubt it.

Hi, just a pro developer here, using primarily Macs, and I have to answer
truthfully, yes, to the above question. Perhaps our firm is an exception,
but we have made a fine living understanding and conquering the
multi-platform/browser issues, and it simply isn't as big a deal as some
of the more whiny developers here and elsewhere would like to make out.
Designing for Mac in general is far less expensive than designing for AOL
and WebTV issues, and even though the latter is in another alleged 2%
minority, you simply have to account for demographics and how it applies
to your product when designing your site.

WebTV people tend to have disposable income, as do Mac owners. For the
extra $100-900 (depending on number of pages) average per HTML-based site
revision it takes to account for each of these platforms, all you need is
a relatively small percentage of your gross to make up for the costs, and
a Flash-based site modification for Mac IE 4.x is a one-time-cost that
can be cut'n'pasted form there on. And, remember, a sale isn't the only
thing you want your customer to bring you; a good experience and good
word of mouth is more valuable to you than a single sale.

Just imagine your website is your physical storefront. Are you
comfortable excluding access to your point of sale because of a handicap
someone might have (let's ignore the legality for the moment)? Not that I
care to think of the Mac as a handicap, but a poorly designed Microsoft
product (IE4.x) is as good as one, despite the quality of the Mac itself.
Are you prepared to tell someone with a walker or wheelchair to go away,
that you don't have the time to build a ramp so that they can patronize
your store? I would like to think not, and I'd also like to remind you
that the Mac is a very popular choice for computer amongst actual
handicapped persons, given its ease of use and high-handicapped software
availability. Even if you determine that the cost of goods and net profit
you make would be too badly damaged by the cost of handicapped access,
you have to factor in the bad faith impression you are going to incur, as
none of these patrons is likely to recommend your site to others.

As others have noted, Macs cost more, and it is pretty easy without
access to genuine demographics to infer that people willing to pay more
for their computers have more money to spend in general, and, personally,
I think you're fool not to accommodate over 1 million iMacs alone (most
bought almost exclusively for the purpose of web surfing), not to mention
the millions of other Mac models in service and on the Web. Be it 2% or
14% of total numbers, I don't give a crap, I pay attention to the actual
number of units shipped and in use in the last 24-36 months for *every*
platform, and that number, to me, when combined with the associated
income levels and spending habits, is more than enough to design for Mac
and WebTV, despite their alleged minority status.

And, let's get back to the reality here: Is it the Mac that's the
problem, or is it Internet Exploder? With Flash, it's certainly just IE,
as Netscape does just fine, even accounting for font issues on poorly
designed, non-CSS sites. That leaves you, as a Flash designer, with
whether or not is is worth your time to apply an hour's worth of
cut'n'paste Javascript to each site to allow IE 4.x Mac users to see your
SWFs (ferkrissakes, it's not like you have to make an entirely different
SWF for each browser). If you can't justify that minimal cost to your
client, then I suggest your client is either selling gumballs or PC-only
products and doesn't care, or has chosen the wrong web developer to begin
with.

Frederico

~Life is what happens to you while you're making other plans.~

--John Lennon


------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-manageratshocker [dot] com. Problems to: owneratshocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratshocker [dot] com


Replies
  Re: FLASH: RE: Macs and market share Que, Bill
  RE: FLASH: RE: Macs and market share Que, Kevin Jackson

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]