Re: Unilever pull out of using Flash after paying for a Flashed Web site

[Josh On]

Surely they could have made flash optional...



>The huge company, Unilever, recently paid for the development of a Flash

>Web site by NoHo in London, but then decided against using Flash in order

>to cater for a lowest common denominator (including Netscape 1 !! and 386

>users) - paying again for a non-Flashed site. They also had to cater for

>Unilever India, which has a slow satellite link allowing only 3 concurrent

>connections.

>

>May be Unilever is a special case, but I want to be able to counter-argue

>Unilever's decision to my own corporate clients who may question their own

>use of Flash after watching the UK TV program "The Net" (broadcast on BBC

>last night) which documented the problems faced by Unilever's first use of

>streaming media.

>

>Any thoughts or similar experiences?

>

>Andrew

>

>

>

>

>

>

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

>To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an

>

email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com

>N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.

>

For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com

>



------------------------------------------------------------------------

To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an

email to

list-managershocker [dot] com

.  Problems to:

ownershocker [dot] com

N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.

For info on digest mode send: info flasher to

list-managershocker [dot] com