Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: FLASH: Aftershock Reliability |
From: | John Croteau |
Date: | Tue, 2 Mar 1999 00:50:29 GMT |
Hi James,
> I know where to find the official information on Aftershock, but what I want
> to know is, in the experience of this group, is it reasonably dependable?
> Any tweaks or revisions to it to make it reliable?
On rare occasions the Aftershock burner will create bad code. Just
recreate the file again. There is an update that needs to be patched
into Aftershock for Windows 98 for some variations of Aftershock code.
http://www.FlashCentral.com/Tech/Detect/Aftershock.htm
----------- -----------------------
John Croteau croteauerols [dot] com (mailto:croteauerols [dot] com)
------------- -------------------------
FlashTek (Advanced Websites with Flash) http://www.FlashTek.com/
Flash Bible (Fast track to good Flash) http://www.FlashBible.com/
Flash Central(The Universe Starts Here) http://www.FlashCentral.com/
The Flash Tech Resource (Tech Notes) http://www.FlashCentral.com/tech/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com
Replies
FLASH: Aftershock Reliability, James Kozick
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]