Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: CHALLENGE! Solved. |
From: | Dave Smith |
Date: | Fri, 8 May 1998 20:01:28 +0100 |
Colin Moock wrote:
>
> John C wrote:
>
> >I'm a little confused but it seems your problem may stem from a poor
> >stucturing problem.
>
> >You should make all your layers in the same scene have the same number
> >of frames. Fill in with empty frames. Should look like this:
>
> >>> LAYER 1: 0--10--20--30(start)--40--50--60...
> >>> LAYER 2: 0--10--20--30--40|.................
> >The frames should all line-up on the last frame.
>
> Exactly. I was trying to explore the reason why a bit more, but the
> point ends up being the same. Communication between movies depends on
> it.
>
> But I'm not sure that it's poor structuring not to fill up all layers
> with empty frames: I actually like to kill off a layer if it's no
> longer active.
I dont think this does anything to the size of .swf Just kinda messy.
I always have even frames at end of each scene/movie/animated
symbol,etc.
Once theres a blankkeyframe left on layer it no longer adds size unless
its the only
layer, which then adds 2bytes per frame.
I think Im right on this.
Keep it neat<g>
-DG-
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com
Replies
Re: No action!, David Robinson
Re: No action!, Dave Smith
Re: No action!, Colin Moock
Re: No action!, Dave Smith
CHALLENGE!, Dave Smith
Re: CHALLENGE!, Jim Curry
Re: CHALLENGE!, Dave Smith
Re: CHALLENGE!, John Croteau
CHALLENGE! Solved., Colin Moock
Re: CHALLENGE! Solved., John Croteau
Re: CHALLENGE! Solved., Colin Moock
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]