Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: FLASH: SiteCheck-Gen2 CPU Hit Question
From: David Mendels
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 18:32:01 GMT

At 11:45 AM 11/19/99 -0500, Robert Alexander wrote:
>Larry mentioned:
>
>>...a sports ticker using Gen2 [in] a flash movie exported
>>as Flash3 and the CPU demand jumped from 40% to %100 on NT. I was
wondering if this is
>>typical.
>>http://www.fantasyteam.com/index2.htm
>
>I'm afraid so, Larry. As long as you're using NT, at least. It just can't
handle the demands. (Don't EVER try to install both a file server and a
print server on NT - it just chokes.)
>
>If you need to handle any kind of serious traffic, you need to get a
serious OS: Solaris, Unix, Linux, etc. There's reasons why the big sites
use these and not NT.


Hi,

Actually quite a few sites are having success with Generator 2 on NT. We
will be publishing a performance white paper with a lot of stats about
performance on various systems fairly soon and that should give you a good
benchmark against what to expect. Also, Generator performance scales along
with number of processors...if you are on a single CPU NT server you might
want to look at a dual or quad CPU server.

-David
Macromedia


flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Streaming Media WEST '99 Conference & Exhibition
"The Worlds largest Internet Audio & Video Event"
December 7 - 9, San Jose Convention Center, California

Reserve your space today at http://www.streamingmedia.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpatchinwag [dot] com


Replies
  RE: FLASH: SiteCheck-Gen2 CPU Hit Questi, Larry Eisenstein
  FLASH: JOB POST- Braincraft is hiring!, Phillip M. Torrone

Replies
  FLASH: SiteCheck-Gen2 CPU Hit Question, Larry Eisenstein
  Re: FLASH: SiteCheck-Gen2 CPU Hit Questi, Robert Alexander

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]