Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: FLASH: Flash limits.
From: David Gary
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 03:00:01 +0100



John Dowdell wrote:

> At 6:36 AM 10/22/98, John Ardelius wrote:
> > When I am authoring flash movies, the frame rate eventually decrease
> > due to heavy bitmaps, sounds and so (I think). Way is that?
>
> What you describe might plausibly be possible... even way possible.
>
> Most pieces usually run at 7-14 fps. Here are some of the factors that can
> affect this:
>
> -- Bigger screen area = more pixels to render = fewer fps
>
> -- The faster the machine, the more fps
>
> -- Streaming is a processor cost too
>
> -- Swapping to disk is a definite hit
>
> -- The more media, the more work
>
> -- The more shapes, the more work
>
> -- Alpha channels are a hit
>
> -- Changes to shapes require processing... morphs count
>
> -- If your piece is bitmap-intensive, then Director can usually give
> faster framerates... it doesn't render things as much as composite them
>

Great post John,

Thats the root of design in Flash.

=8>)-

-DG-


------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-manageratshocker [dot] com. Problems to: owneratshocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratshocker [dot] com


Replies
  Re: FLASH: Flash limits., John Dowdell

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]