Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: AW: FLASH: Is internet design with Flash possible? ;-) |
From: | David Gary |
Date: | Wed, 28 Oct 1998 18:34:54 GMT |
Robert Warnke wrote:
> Please come down! Flash - the new Jesus? :-)
> What is really new? OK some neat things. But there are some disadvantage
> too.
> A bad design with Flash has more disadvantage than neat things. And I saw a
> lot of bad design with Flash.
>
Welcome to the web, visit http://www.websitesthatsuck
for more info.
Robert theres bad design in everything. Its the process of of the inexperienced
to become experienced. How can you blame bad design on the tool itself.
Thats like saying, "man, the hammer that built my house sucks " to the
inexperienced carpenter who built it. Please dont use MM as a scapegoat to the
average Joe
who just bought a puter, DLed the demo of Flash, and said, O' cool, Im a "Flash
designer"! Impractical, as the rest of your debate.
To bring up serious flaws in the tool or what could be immplemented to make it
better is one thing, but to blame someone's use of the tool on the tool itself
is another. How do you say "Apples and oranges" in German?
-DG-
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com
Replies
<OT>Re: AW: FLASH: Is internet design wi, Marc Hoffman
Replies
AW: FLASH: Is internet design with Flash, Robert Warnke
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]