[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]

Subject: Re: UKNM: plug-in take up/stats
From: Phil Gyford
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 15:29:10 +0100

At 10:05 24/04/1999 -0700, you wrote:

>How about a specific example. Here's Peppers and Rogers
>1 to 1 Checkpoint Tool and you get the choice: with or
>without Flash.
>Which is "better"?

I vote for without Flash. Easier to understand the info without whizzing
text and graphical devices getting in the way and distracting me. Flash
version doesn't add anything that can't be said in the normal version.

Phil Gyford
http://www.gyford.com / philatgyford [dot] com
w:0171.766.6491 / h:0171.622.9058 / m:0850.958.299
Deputy Editor, Capital Interactive / http://capitalinteractive.com

UKNM is sponsored by Excite UK, visit us at http://www.excite.co.uk.
Email Khalil Ibrahimi khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com (mailto:khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com) to advertise on Excite.
Change your UKNM subscription use http://www.chinwag.com/uknm.html

  Re: UKNM: plug-in take up/stats, Jim Sterne

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]