[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]

Subject: RE: UKNM: Frames and Search Engines
From: Lee Atkinson
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 12:22:28 +0100

A bit off tangent, but does anybody really know the exact criteria that
search engines rates your site? Is it the most matches of your meta-keywords
against the actual content of your pages. or is it the site that has the
most trafic, the most pages, or what?


Spring Interactive
Lee_atkinsonatspring [dot] com

-----Original Message-----
From: Ally Shuttleworth [allyatfunkycat [dot] com (mailto:allyatfunkycat [dot] com)]
Sent: 28 April 1999 19:08
To: uk-netmarketingatchinwag [dot] com
Subject: Re: UKNM: Frames and Search Engines

>As a whole we don't use frames on the sites that we build for the single
>reason that it is very difficult to get a search engine to go through the
>whole site properly.

Someone who has a site, which is quite good, functions well etc. but is
built using frames quite heavily.

They say to you "we want to be higher in the search engines", after
explaining to them about frames and search engines...what would you advise
them to do?

Re-build their site from scratch? Make do with the present site, and tweak
other areas (metas etc.)?

Open question.

Ally Shuttleworth
Funkycat Search

[web] http://www.funkycat.com
[e-mail] allyatfunkycat [dot] com

UKNM is sponsored by Excite UK, visit us at http://www.excite.co.uk.
Email Khalil Ibrahimi khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com (mailto:khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com) to advertise on Excite.
Change your UKNM subscription use http://www.chinwag.com/uknm.html

  Re: UKNM: Frames and Search Engines, Stefan Magdalinski
  Re: UKNM: Frames and Search Engines, Greg Crockart (Hyperlink

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]