[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: Memes and marketing
From: Quentin Langley
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 16:56:42 +0100

Memes, like genes, do not have any "inherent desires".
It is simply the case that successful memes/genes
will prosper and others will not. Memes compete with
other memes for use of resources - brain power - but
only have a particular "interest" in defeating their
allele, or opposite.

For further reading try "The Selfish Gene" by Richard
Dawkins.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0192860925/

--- Rory Teeling <rory_teelingatyahoo [dot] com> wrote:
> Apropos of nothing going on in discussions to date:
>
> Has anybody come across memetic theory, wherein the
> argument is posited that ideas, like genes have an
> inherent 'desire' to propogate and replicate, and
> peoples minds are fundamentally meme incubators.
>
> Strong memes invade minds and 'evict' less strong
> memes. Information iteslf is merely the carrier of
> memes, and opens the mind to allow the meme carried
> to
> take up residence.
>
> If this is true, what does that make us in the meme
> transfer and evolution model?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
post new media vacancies for free uknm-jobsatchinwag [dot] com
*******************
sponsor the uk-netmarketing list and website, contact
salesatchinwag [dot] com for more details.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



Replies
  Re: UKNM: Memes and marketing, Paul Gill

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]