[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]

Subject: Re: UKNM: New Media Age Chat
From: Sam Michel
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 17:59:38 +0100

At 02:05 PM 8/10/98 +0000, you wrote:
>>I'm not having a go in any way, but I've just rec'd this mail considerably
>>later than the time the event started. I've noticed the delay in the past,
>>and I doubt there's any way round it, but if your message is time-related,
>>can you send it as far in advance as possible.
>Sorry about that. I sent the message just after 3 with the intention of
>providing a last minute prompt for interested parties, but see that that
>went slightly awry when it arrived on the list (for me, anyway) at 4:30. I
>think Sam Michel owes me a beer and a sloppy kiss. Well, a beer anyway.

Tongues as usual? Bleurgh!

Seriously though, I try and forward messages to the list as quickly as
possible. They are normally processed pretty speedily by the mail server as
UKNM has a high priority. If there's a delay, it's probably because:

a. I'm not around to put messages through
b. The email system between you and the server is clogged.

Hope this clarifies things a bit!

Toodle Pip

Chinwag - http://www.chinwag.com
ICQ Pager: 4561042

  Re: UKNM: New Media Age Chat, Robert Venes

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]