[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: [uk-netmarketing] RE: fall of the dotcoms?
From: Alex Bainbridge
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 23:39:07 -0000

Hey, I know a few companies, in the travel sector, who are now operating
profitably (month on month)..... including ourselves - now wouldn't that
make good TV...

I saw a program the other day that said that no British dot com has made a
profit yet ! - well I assume that this is because of tax reasons etc...

(My definition of dot com is one where more than 50% of sales (or revenue
perhaps) is derived from online sales / online marketing)

Another interesting angle is perhaps the potential demise of the dot com and
the rise of the dot corp - but this is very sector specific and more a
subject for a open univeristy program rather than prime time viewing!

Alex
First48 UK
www.first48.com

ps - don't phone to sell us anything

----- Original Message -----
From: David Simpson <david [dot] simpsonatpool [dot] net>
To: uk-netmarketing from chinwag <uk-netmarketingatlists [dot] chinwag [dot] com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 10:51 AM
Subject: [uk-netmarketing] RE: fall of the dotcoms?


> Steve
>
> > 1. Does anyone here seriously believe that the apocalyptic reversal
> > of fortune the dotcom world has just gone through (and will continue
> > to go through) is *not* worthy of a TV programme?
>
> yeah but just not worthy of *another* TV programme
>
> > 2. Is anyone so self-deluding as to believe that this really is
> > 'business as usual', that it's just sorting out the sheep from the
> > goats, that it'll all be over by Christmas, that any other business
> > sector has ever experienced such a punishing crash,
>
> whoa there - "self -deluding" ?
> there *is* potential, good companies *will* come through. Few if any
> industries have witnessed such a crash, but the meteoric rise was fairly
> unusual too. No-one is saying that what happened wasn't news worthy,
> spectacular even, but it's *old* news.
>
> > so much real
> > personal misery?
>
> can you talk to me Steve, lovey, can you ?
>
> > 3. Are you seriously telling me that you don't recognise *any* of the
> > characters in Kevin's email
>
> no - indeed I recognise most of them , but like I (and plenty of others)
> said, time to move on ?
>
> David
>
> ______________________________
> David Simpson
> Pool.Net
> www.pool.net
> ______________________________



[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]