RE: UKNM: Email autoresponders: effective or offensive?

[Bunder, Leslie]

there's probably something in the small print that says while they may

promise a 24 hour response, due to technical reasons, etc, etc, this is not

part of the contract and users accept that.


Might be worth reading the terms of conditions of Web sites as when you buy

something online you confirm you have accepted them.


Which leads to another question... How many people actually read the terms

and conditions of a Web site before they order or progress further on a

site???


Leslie


 > ----------

 >

From: Lee Rickler[SMTP:leedjindex [dot] com]

 > Sent: 	09 January 2000 02:26

 >

To: uk-netmarketingchinwag [dot] com

 > Subject: 	Re: UKNM: Email autoresponders:  effective or offensive?

 > 

 > Whilst we are on the subject .........

 > 

 > Can companies not be sued for promising this?

 > 

 > What would happen after 24 hours of them not calling?

 > 

 > Lee

 > 

 >  >auto-responders are useful and helpful, so long as you really do respond

 >  >in the time you say.

 >  >

 >  >unlike for instance, jungle.com, who took 29 days to send me an

 >  >autoresponse offering a human response in 24 hours, that, of course,

 >  >never came at all.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

post new media vacancies for free

uknm-jobschinwag [dot] com

 				*******************

 sponsor the uk-netmarketing list and website, contact

saleschinwag [dot] com

 for more details.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to

http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or

helpchinwag [dot] com