[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: stats for TV viewers who are also online
From: Speechrad
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 21:27:44 GMT

I was told by someone involved in the campaign that a 30 second spot in
superbowl costs half a million dollars. Apple took one shot at showing its
1984 style Advert on that spot and never showed it again in the US. I was
told they got 200,000 leads from the 30 second spot.

Radio, TV and ' dot com's ' are complementary, not necessarilly competing.
For advertisers they each have strengths and weaknesses, as I guess they do
for their audiences. Video didn't kill the cinema and Sky / cable didn't
kill
video rentals. One medium can definitely drive traffic to another for a
specific purpose, such as sales but they will return.

At least that's our story, but it would be wouldn't it.
Michael
Internet Speech Radio
www.speechradio.com

In a message dated 17/03/00 12:45:44 GMT Standard Time,
robatNetImperative [dot] com
writes:

<< This is from US research, but is interesting nonetheless, perhaps for
Euro
2000...

NPD Online Research figures from the Super Bowl, earlier this year, showed
that 12% of the TV audience visited a site advertised during the ad breaks,
of which 58% went on to make a purchase. Both the FedEx and WebMD (which
featured Mohammed Ali) ads achieved a 65% recall, while the report also
revealed that 22% of viewers were also online while watching the Super
Bowl.

Robert Venes
content & community director
netimperative.com
t: 0207 684 3463 >>


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
post new media vacancies for free uknm-jobsatchinwag [dot] com
*******************
sponsor the uk-netmarketing list and website, contact
salesatchinwag [dot] com for more details.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]