[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: Re[2]: UKNM: so net marketing types?
From: Nick Suckley
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 17:11:30 +0100

Did you realise McCann and Lowe are owned by the same parent company -
Interpublic!

Suckley Media
Independent media planning for the net
nick [dot] suckleyatvirgin [dot] net
0171 286 2575

-----Original Message-----
From: Felix Velarde <felixathead-newmedia [dot] com>
To: uk-netmarketingatchinwag [dot] com <uk-netmarketingatchinwag [dot] com>
Date: 06 October 1998 14:27
Subject: Re[2]: UKNM: so net marketing types?


>There seem to be two schools of thought: the McCann-Erickson argument
>- it doesn't matter as long as it's profitable, and the Lowe
>Howard-Spink argument - creative excellence breeds success.
>
>I know that it means that such an agency will never be the biggest
>agency in the world, but it does have the opportunity to a) be the
>most creatively focused, and b) the ones who enjoy their work the
>most. And it does seem to work. IPG have, naturally, hedged their
>bets. Maybe Sky should have done too.
>
>On 6/10/98 I read:
>
>>PC Display aesthetics aside, we should of course continue to argue
>>the toss.
>>However, whatever individual industry opinion about the Sky
>>campaign, it worked.
>>In fact it did extremely well on CTR alone.
>
>Felix Velarde
>
>Managing Director Head New Media
>
>[ success is about interaction ]
>[ voice + 44 (0) 171 737 7579 ]
>[ http://www.head-newmedia.com ]
>
>



Replies
  Re: Re[2]: UKNM: so net marketing types?, Felix Velarde

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]