[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: Legal implications on the web
From: Ray Taylor
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:54:01 +0100

Giles Turnbull <gilesatgorjuss [dot] com> said:

> At 08:47 05/10/00, Ray wrote:
> >Copyright and other intellectual property rights are media-independent.

> Yes but even if they are media-independent, they are not
> technology-independent. Surely one of the most crucial points is that
media
> of all kinds is becoming easier to create and distribute digitally. MP3s
> for music, ebooks for books, and so on.

Sure, every new technology makes crime a lot easier for the criminal. I
don't think there was a single case of someone photocopying a book before
the photocopier was invented.

But the legal rules are still the same, and should not be dependent on the
technology, as they would then have to be changed more and more frequently
and lawyers and legislators are expensive time wasters.

If intellectual property is becoming easier to create and distribute, then
it is becoming correspondingly less valuable. So what's the problem? If you
create something valuable and leave it where a crook can easily find it and
steal it, that's your problem, not the technology's, not the law's.

So the invention of video is going to put the film business out of business?
Most UKNMers are too young to remember that thread, of course.

Ray Taylor


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
looking for useful books about the new media biz?
check out the UKNM books page for some suggestions:
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing/books.shtml
Email suggestions to: helpatchinwag [dot] com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



Replies
  Re: UKNM: Legal implications on the web, Sam Carrington

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]