[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: The truth about the value of Coke's brand
From: Ray Taylor
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 09:02:51 +0100

Following on from what Charlie Osmond <charlieosmondatyahoo [dot] com> said...

...It also follows that the 65% who prefered Coke in the open test were
heavily influenced by all the communications output from the Coca Cola
company over the decades.

But if you asked them whether they were influenced by brand advertising,
these same 65% would say "of course not, I never take any notice of
advertising," in much the same way as they might say "I never click on
banner ads."

A person's dignity (particularly a young adult's dignity) would be offended
by any admission that, far from exercising free will in product choice, that
person is merely responding - and without thinking - to an advertising
message.

This is the root cause of anti-advertising feeling - a gut reaction to one's
latent fear of losing one's ability to choose for one's self.

It is important to understand the difference between responding to a need,
and making a choice.

Nobody "chooses" Coke, they merely respond to a desire or belief that has
been planted in their subconscious by a series of advertising campaigns.

Ray Taylor


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]